AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR
I'm upgrading from a Tamron 18-200 (non VC) so this will be in comparison to that. I'm using it on a D300. The focus is much faster and very much quieter. So far the focus seems more accurate, too. Between that and the VR I'm getting many more keepers. I've never had VR before, so I'm still getting used to that. The only quibble I have is that the zoom is a little stiff and uneven in tension as you turn the ring. I'm hoping the stiffness means that it's sealed better, but the unevenness is not good. Maybe it will get better with more use. To end on a good note, I'm sure I chose the best available super-zoom out there.
April 27, 2014
Great lens, very versatlie
My wife and I just came back from a months vacation in the UK and took a newly acquired D7100 body a 35mm 1.8G and the new version 18-300mm 3.5~6.3 telephoto. In the whole month and in all situations both outside & inside this lens NEVER left the camera body! I never ran across a shooting situation that required me to change out to the 35mm. It works very well with the built in flash and should be fantastic with a speedlight. Very fast and accurate A.F., clarity, shapness etc. I can honestly say this is the travel lens I have ever owned!
Very highly recommended!
August 10, 2014
Lente para ninguém por defeito
Sou amador, amadoríssimo. Excelente zoom, permite uma enorme maneabilidade de fotografia, penso que está é a melhor lente que já tive na vida. Excelente compra que fiz!!!!!
October 12, 2014
Doubt for 300mm focal length
I just bought this lens (18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR) from Singapore and bring back to my home (Jakarta-Indonesia). At the beginning I was really excited and shot my pictures. Previously I have one AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED. I try to compare the result on 300mm focal length and I doubt the result of the 18-300, the image is not so close as the result of the 70-300mm. Why the image is not the same?
September 27, 2014
Not a sports lens.
I bought this lens primarily for my daughters soccer games. I need the 300 to get across the field and 18 for when the girls run up to me at the sidelines. In theory, it sounds like a great idea; however the quality isn't good for sports. When zoomed even to a 200, the photos are distorted and shaky. I have also noticed the Continuous Shooting Speed has slowed down, which has prevented some of those OMG did you see that moments. I will return it and go back to my 55-200 for now. :-(
As for an all in one (still shots), it is good as long as you don't mind spending the money.
September 10, 2014